Re: Are The Suns Cursed? Book it!
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2025 9:59 am
We were tied with GS in the standings when they traded for Butler…they’ve gone 20-6 and we’ve gone 9-18
A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
if it is pointless to discuss Booker's value because Ishbia is in control, why engage in a Suns discussion forum at all? I'd be delighted to let you cop out of THE critical question regarding the Suns future if you had not ended your post with a personal attack insinuating my opinion is based on "hate."
1tinsoldier wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:14 pmif it is pointless to discuss Booker's value because Ishbia is in control, why engage in a Suns discussion forum at all? I'd be delighted to let you cop out of THE critical question regarding the Suns future if you had not ended your post with a personal attack insinuating my opinion is based on "hate."
so. Simple question:
Do you believe building around Booker with a 70 mil per year deal is in the Suns best interest?
TOO wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 1:26 pm1tinsoldier wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:14 pmif it is pointless to discuss Booker's value because Ishbia is in control, why engage in a Suns discussion forum at all? I'd be delighted to let you cop out of THE critical question regarding the Suns future if you had not ended your post with a personal attack insinuating my opinion is based on "hate."
so. Simple question:
Do you believe building around Booker with a 70 mil per year deal is in the Suns best interest?
I say this as a guy who was one of the first to jump on the move Booker train a few seasons ago, you could do worse. I do not think Booker is the problem, it's the roster construction around him.
Bookers 14th on the list well ahead of KD. Anyhow…. Thought it was interesting and helps show that Booker isn’t as bad as we think compared to all other NBA players.Well, let’s explain what that is.
Global Rating is a statistical tool created by HoopsHype’s Alberto de Roa that measures players’ and teams’ performance taking into account not only individual stats but also team and competition strength.
As opposed to some other advanced stats, the main idea is that individual stats can’t be measured in a vacuum. No matter the competition, having a 20-10-5 season for the championship team will always have more value than doing it for the worst team. And when comparing competitions, having a great season against the best squads in the world will always have more value than accomplishing that against minnows. The goal for Global Rating is to understand and measure this nuance.
The process has several automated steps. First one is to assign an individual number factoring simple stats from each player. Points, rebounds, assists, blocks, steals, turnovers, fouls and shooting efficiency are the basis for that stat.
The next step takes into account the performance of the team and the impact a player had in it. If a player is on the court for 35 minutes in a 20-point win, the impact has nothing to do with the one of a player who only logged five minutes.
The amount of games a player has missed in a certain season or competition is also factored in. That helps differentiate players that have been productive for their teams on a regular basis from others standing out due to small samples. That’s especially useful when discussing awards, where voters and fans prioritize players who have been on the court for most of the year
That isn't a 'very specific build'; that's just modern basketball team.TOO wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 2:35 pmDevin Booker is very good, I just think he requires a very specific build around him, lots of wings who can defend and rebound but also finish his passes, a C who can clean up the slack and a PG who can orchestrate but also hit an open jumper when Book is running things. We had it during the finals run, that's what he requires.
He obviously would have. All you have to do is look at the Warriors since they acquired him.Kryptonic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:54 amHonestly I think it would have had a huge impact. Love him or hate him, he’s the bulldog we needed.BigLewy wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 8:27 amWe needed Jimmy Butler.....stupid Beal NTC.Kryptonic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 7:43 amI hear ya. We need a barker and someone who’ll be able to hold people accountable.Mori Chu wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 7:04 amThis is an interesting comment. I do agree with your comment that we lack something from our team leaders, and it makes me think about the nature of "leadership" from a player. IMO you can provide more than one kind of leadership, with differing effects. You can be a leader in terms of being a team's centerpiece player, the main scorer, the guy who gets double-teamed and hacked and focused on by the other team, the guy who will take the big shot under pressure to try to carry the team to a win. And I think Book and KD both provide THAT kind of leadership. And that counts for something. Both of those guys do lead in the way I just described. There's also leading by example: showing up early to practice, working on your craft, working hard, putting in the time, giving a shit. I think Book (moreso) and KD also provide THAT kind of leadership. You should aspire to work as hard as they do to improve.
But there's the other kind of player leadership, the kind Kryptonic is talking about, which is more like vocal or motivational in-game leadership. Barking at your teammates to get them to hustle. Calling out defensive rotations and plays. Basically just being in everyone's ear the whole game. Clearly CP3 provided that for us in spades, and neither Book nor KD is wired like that. They just don't do it. And it does seem like a great NBA team needs at least 1-2 guys like that. You can really feel the absence of it on our team the past 2 years.
So I think Book/KD's leadership is a mixed bag. They do provide a lot of it, but a really important piece of it is missing, and we feel it every game. I think if we had a barker like CP3 on the roster who the players listened to and respected, you would see much better outcomes even from the same flawed roster we have today.
Since I was gone from the site, three posters have answered your question pretty eloquently. And you must admit that a lot of this thread appears to be "hating", if you're honest with yourself. There are better ways to present your arguments. Especially when you label all posters that don't agree with you. That is a conversation ender right there.1tinsoldier wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:14 pmif it is pointless to discuss Booker's value because Ishbia is in control, why engage in a Suns discussion forum at all? I'd be delighted to let you cop out of THE critical question regarding the Suns future if you had not ended your post with a personal attack insinuating my opinion is based on "hate."
so. Simple question:
Do you believe building around Booker with a 70 mil per year deal is in the Suns best interest?
I am assuming that you are talking about Bradley Beal. If so in my opinion he is the biggest problem with our roster.Mori Chu wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 3:28 pmHow about this? It's hard to build a championship contender around Devin Booker if you spend almost 100% of the rest of your cap on another finishing scorer who needs the ball, and a guy who plays the same position as Booker but is older, shittier, and injured 50% of the time?
Well logic would say he needs to convince a majority of the fans, not necessarily all.Superbone wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 12:50 amYou said:1tinsoldier wrote: ↑Mon Apr 07, 2025 10:31 pmi don't understand your logic:
why would i have to convince "every single Sun's fan?"
why would a "Suns fan through and through" put fandom for 1 player above the future interest of the Suns without presenting one valid reason for paying him 70 million per season.
"actually, it's only because Ishbia believes local fans have been indoctrinated with the Booker myth, that he won't let Booker go. So...if you let go, Booker could go."
Either you are saying, I alone have the power to get Ishbia to trade Booker or all the fans do. The logic is based on what you said.
Still by far the high scorer for the Suns tonight.
I wouldn’t expect a “basketball sicko” (as Booker used to be described on here) to just let their team give up before they’re eliminated. But I guess he did in all the elimination games he’s played in as well.
you're talking mostly about current championship contenders without Booker. With Booker i believe their chances go down. Like the other Booker lovers, you keep forgetting that OTHER side of the court. Booker is a defensive liability and the teams you're talking about already have enough offensive firepower.Split T wrote: ↑Tue Apr 08, 2025 2:49 pmHere’s a question, how many teams do you think you could slide Booker in place of their SG and be a contender?
Here’s who I think
OKC with Booker instead of Jalen Williams
Houston with Booker instead of Jalen Green
Lakers with Booker instead of Austin Reaves
Nuggets with Booker instead of Murray
Warriors with Booker instead of Podz(this one probably isn’t fair)
That’s probably it in the West.
Cavs with Booker instead of Mitchell
Celtics with Booker instead of Brown or White
Knicks with Booker instead of Bridges
Bucks with Booker instead of Trent
That’s 9 teams Book would fit right in on and be a championship contender with. Lots of other teams he’d make a good team.
I think it’s hard to build a contender with him as your best player, but it’s quite easy with him as your 2nd best.