Split T wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 3:40 pm
Carno wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 2:23 pm
Split T wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 1:16 pm
Carno wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 12:51 pm
Mori Chu wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2024 11:46 am
IMO there's no way Miami considers a Butler / Beal trade without our 2031 1st being in the trade. And my guess is that before long, Ishbia and JJ will surrender it. Even that might not be enough to get a deal done given than Jimmy is having big games while Beal is already getting hurt.
I don't get this thinking. Beal and Butler are comparable players. Suns aren't sending trash. I don't see a reason to send the '31 pick, which could be very valuable. Maybe I get on board with a 2nd, but I still think these players are about equal.
It really feels like this board undervalues Suns players and by a lot.
Butler is a better player than Beal…He might not be leaps and bounds better, but he’s better. Add in that Beal isn’t a great fit for Miami(similar problem in that their best perimeter player is also a SG) and he has the exact contract they refused to give Jimmy and one can see why Miami isn’t thrilled to pull the trigger. Doesn’t even bring the NTC into the picture.
The more I think about it, the more I think this would have to be a 3-team trade. We need to find someone that wants Beal and that Beal also wants(Lakers really are the only team that comes to mind). That or we need to make it worth it for Miami and that means 2031 at a minimum.
We don't know the exact reason Miami doesn't want to extend Butler. It might be age, money, 2nd apron, or because he's a moment away from fist fighting Spoelstra. It's probably a combination of all of that. The calculus is a little different with Beal, with age and demeaner maybe being enough to give Beal the edge.
One thing we know for sure, if/when Butler gets traded, he won't be looking in the rearview mirror!
True. It might be a little different. But I’m just trying to look at this without bias. Miami knows this is a huge win for us…they are clearly going to ask for compensation. There will be some negotiating and I hope we can find a way to not include 2031…I just would give that up if the alternative was not getting Butler.
Agreed. And since trading for Butler would respond to the goal of winning it all with Durant and Booker, keeping two pieces like Dunn and Oso is more interesting than holding onto the 2031 pick. I guess we will see.
As for why MIA and Butler are not in agreement, I imagine it comes down to money, plain and simple. It was rumored that MIA put on the table a two-year extension worth $113 million, but that's probably too short in Butler's eyes since by becoming a free agent he can get almost 4/250M; and at that range, I can see why Riley is balking considering Butler's age and the fact that MIA's roster ceiling is basically exhausted, with little flexibility to improve.
Now, on how Beal would play into MIA's exit plan from Butler, I guess it could be an acceptable compromise if they want to avoid rebuilding for one or two more seasons, while not having the extra years under insane money that Butler would require. If I am MIA, would that be better than just letting Butler leave as a free agent? We don't know how they value Beal the player, but in any case I'd have to look at the additional compensation (if any) that I was offered. For Dunn I do it 100%. Oso, too little and I already have Ware and Jovic behind Bam, so no. The 2031 pick? 100% no question. 2ndR picks? Nah. Again, I guess we will see.