Cap wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 2:21 pm
Split T wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 10:23 am
Is there a world where we waive and stretch Nurk?
Is there a world where we don’t suck for the rest of the season and even worse for the next ten? Worrying about Nurk feels kinda pointless now.
Of course there is…Look this team has a lot of problems, but I don’t actually think we’re in danger of being bad unless we choose that direction intentionally. We seem stuck a little in the middle with pretty limited options to improve, but we’ve already seen an ability to make things happen with those limited resources.
We still have a 28 year old Devin Booker. Kevin Durant still looks like a top 10 guy. Beal hasn’t been the fit we were hoping, but he’s still a good player. Grayson and Royce have value and are locked up to good deals. We seem to have landed some pretty good rookies in Dunn and Oso…
Nurk is clearly the weakest link on the team at the weakest position on the team. Fixing that position would go a long ways towards fixing this team. Remember when Dallas was a play-in team and then traded for Daniel Gafford and PJ Washington and made the finals? I don’t know what our version of that trade is, but that is certainly possible.
We’d need some health luck, but a Tyus, Beal, Booker, KD lineup with just an average starting C is a good team. Not a team anyone is going to pick to win a championship, but do they have a greater than 1% chance? Ya I think so.
I think we also forget that we will only owe 2 picks after this year. I don’t think it would be that hard to pivot this summer to a non 2nd apron team, get access back to our 2033 pick and retool around Booker(of course you gotta move KD in this scenario). You could also pull the plug and get your picks back from Houston and choose to rebuild.
I just don’t see the future as bleak as some of you do.