Benghazi backfire

* THIS SECTION IS NOW CLOSED *
Locked
Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Been a few good weeks for Hilary Clinton. They're about to get better...

http://samuel-warde.com/2015/10/cia-tre ... y-clinton/
CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton

In a bombshell revelation, the Central Intelligence Agency reached out to Democrats serving on the Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday to confirm that Chairman Trey Gowdy had altered documents provided to the committee by Hillary Clinton.

Monday, October 5, 2015, all five Democratic Members of the Select Committee on Benghazi sent a letter informing House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (F-SC) that they planned to begin releasing witness interview transcripts, starting with the interview of former State Department Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, in order to correct the public record after numerous inaccurate Republican leaks.



“Despite claims that the Committee would be run with integrity, Republicans have engaged in a series of selective leaks of inaccurate and incomplete information in an effort to attack Secretary Clinton with unsubstantiated or previously debunked allegations,” the Democrats wrote.

On October 7, 2015, Gowdy sent a response to ranking minority member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), stating that he was “disheartened at the nature and tone of Monday’s letter from your Democrat colleagues and you.”

In the letter, Gowdy referred extensively to Sidney Blumenthal, a long-time confidante and adviser to the Clintons, who served as assistant and senior adviser to Bill Clinton from August 1997 until January 2001.

In addition to Sidney Blumenthal’s business interests, Secretary Clinton also apparently received classified information from Blumenthal- information she should have known was classified at the time she received it. In one email, Blumenthal writes “Tyler spoke to a colleague currently at CIA, who told him the agency had been dependent for intelligence from [redacted due to sources and methods].”1 This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but also human lives. Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded the email to a colleague–debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.1 There may be other instances as well where Secretary Clinton passed on classified information she received from Sidney Blumenthal. [emphasis added]



However, as Newsweek reported on Sunday, the CIA informed the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday that Gowdy’s claims were false:

Indeed, according to committee correspondence reviewed by Newsweek, the CIA did tell the panel on Saturday that it had reviewed 127 emails between Clinton and her close friend and outside adviser, Sidney Blumenthal, and none of it was deemed classified.

“The CIA reviewed the material in question and informed State that it required no redactions,” the agency informed Susan Sachsman Grooms, staff director and general counsel for the panel’s Democrats, on October 17.

On Sunday, Cummings sent a letter to Gowdy to correct the public record in light of the fact that the CIA had debunked Chairman Gowdy’s accusations.

Cummings began, writing that: “On October 7, 2015, you sent me a 13-page letter making a grave new accusation against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Specifically, you accused her of compromising national security and endangering lives,” adding that, “The problem with your accusation—as with so many others during this investigation—is that you failed to check your facts before you made it, and the CIA has now informed the Select Committee that you were wrong. I believe your accusations were irresponsible, and I believe you owe the Secretary an immediate apology.”



Cummings went on to accuse Gowdy of making the false claims against Clinton in an attempt to diffuse controversy surround Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the purpose of the Benghazi hearings was to discredit Clinton.

It appears that your letter was rushed out to the press to counter the public firestorm caused by Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s stark admission that Republicans are using millions of taxpayer dollars to damage Secretary Clinton’s bid for president. However, your letter only provided further evidence of this fact.

Speaking directly to Gowdy’s accusations against Clinton, Cummings wrote:

In your letter on October 7, 2015, you stated that Secretary Clinton received an email from Sidney Blumenthal on March 18, 2011, that included the name of someone who purportedly provided information to the CIA. You asserted that this information was classified, arguing that Secretary Clinton “received classified information from Blumenthal—information she should have known was classified at the time she received it.” You then alleged:

Armed with that information, Secretary Clinton forwarded that email to a colleague—debunking her claim that she never sent any classified information from her private email address.

In your letter, you went to great lengths to highlight the gravity of your accusation, stating:

This information, the name of a human source, is some of the most protected information in our intelligence community, the release of which could jeopardize not only national security but human lives.

Cummings then dropped the bomb – accusing Gowdy of altering documents in an effort to frame Clinton:

To further inflate your claim, you placed your own redactions over the name of the individual with the words, “redacted due to sources and methods.” To be clear, these redactions were not made, and these words were not added, by any agency of the federal government responsible for enforcing classification guidelines.

Cummings continued, emphasizing the fact that the CIA had thoroughly debunked Gowdy’s false claims against Clinton:

Contrary to your claims, the CIA yesterday informed both the Republican and Democratic staffs of the Select Committee that they do not consider the information you highlighted in your letter to be classified. Specifically, the CIA confirmed that “the State Department consulted with the CIA on this production, the CIA reviewed these documents, and the CIA made no redactions to protect classified information.”

Unfortunately, you sent your letter on October 7 without checking first with the CIA. Now that we have done so, we have learned that your accusations were incorrect.

Cummings concluded his letter, writing that Gowdy’s actions have “brought discredit” on the Benghazi investigation and has “undermine[d] the integrity” of the committee and the House of Representatives itself:

Unfortunately, the standard operating procedure of this Select Committee has become to put out information publicly that is inaccurate and out of context in order to attack Secretary Clinton for political reasons. These repeated actions bring discredit on this investigation and undermine the integrity of the Select Committee and the House of Representatives.
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/trey-g ... ver/22908/
Trey Gowdy caught using his own private email server

For months, republican Benghazi committee chairman Trey Gowdy has been playing up the fact that Hillary Clinton used her own private email server for conducting official government business. That’s set off a firestorm which has forced four separate government agencies to step in and defend her against a wide range of false accusations. Now it turns out Gowdy himself has been running his own congressional email through a private server of his own.

Although three Secretaries of State in a row from two different political parties each opted to have their own email server installed at the State Department in order to bypass the inept official server, republicans have attempted to single out Hillary Clinton for doing so. Trey Gowdy has used his position as head of the Benghazi committee to pore over thousands of her emails, public and private. Gowdy spent much of her testimony this week publicly misstating what was in some of those emails, forcing Clinton to correct him in front of the cameras. But not only has Clinton emerged from the now-debunked scandal unscathed, Gowdy’s own private email server has come into focus.

It turns out Trey Gowdy has been running his info@treygowdy.com email address through a private email server, despite giving that address out as an official point of contact and almost certainly receiving official government correspondence through that address. Additionally his republican colleague Jason Chaffetz has been caught giving out a Gmail address for official correspondence, which is also run through a private email server. One wonders if we’ll see an eighteen month investigation into their email as well.
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Secret Emails Reveal George W. Bush & Tony Blair Plotted To Deceive Public To Justify Iraq War

A White House memo revealed a “deal in blood” forged by George W. Bush and England’s former Prime Minister Tony Blair over the war in Iraq. Blair gave Bush an unqualified pledge in April of 2002 that he would support the conflict a year before the invasion started.



When Republicans forced Hillary Clinton to release all the emails from her time as Secretary of State, they hoped to find a “gotcha” smoking gun they could turn into another scandal. Instead, they found an email trail from her predecessor, Colin Powell, linking British Prime Minister Tony Blair to George W. Bush.

Daily Mail reported the secret emails in question reveal Powell and Bush were working with Blair, laying the groundwork for deceiving the public (and Congress) into believing Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. It has since been established there were no such weapons in Iraq. To a large extent, the Bush administration has gotten away with the deception by claiming faulty intelligence. The email trail suggests that Powell, Bush and Blair worked together for an entire year to justify the invasion.



Lying to Congress in order to get them to approve a military invasion is considered traitorous.

Whether or not this email trail provides enough evidence to convict anyone in the Bush administration of a crime is not yet clear, but it certainly serves as more evidence the Iraq war a premeditated sham.
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9706
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Nodack »

Nice stuff. Lots of examples of Republicans being evil.

I already knew the Iraq was was planned long before 9/11 and that Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld fabricated the war, but it's nice to see the evidence.

The Benghazi thing has ended up hurting the Republicans and helping Hillary. Feel bad for them.... not.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Thought you might like it.

Image
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12131
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by carey »

I freakin love Elizabeth Warren. She'd never run against Hillary but damn she's just brilliant
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

carey wrote:I freakin love Elizabeth Warren. She'd never run against Hillary but damn she's just brilliant
Absolutely. If by some quirk Republicans did win in '16 I think it would set in stone a Warren Presidency on '20. It would almost be worth it.
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9706
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Nodack »

She could run on the premise of stopping the war the Republicans start. They all pretty much promised to start a war with somebody, especially Rubio.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

Ladmo
Posts: 247
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Benghazi backfire

Post by Ladmo »

Speaking Republicans at war... anyone catch the Republican Debate tonight?
Forcing me to conform to your beliefs is an exercise in futility.
You deal with you, because you can't stop me from being me.

Locked