Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Online
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
It was a bad draft going in and we weren't going to take a PG like Dunn because we (McD) was still committed to Bledsoe and we had out SG in Booker so no point in Hield (not that I was crazy about him either). We needed bigs and Bender was the consensus but we doubled down on Chriss. Should've traded out of the lotto and acquired a future lotto or something. Instead, we compounded things by taking 2 marginal bigs.
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
I wanted Dunn or Hield. I would have traded down.
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Even if you don’t think they blew it, he still lacks any aggression and his age isn’t an excuse for how passive he is.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
I don't know why you don't think his age/experience can't be a reason for his lack of aggression. I'm not saying he can turn into Westbrook, but is it that hard to believe a guy who's been playing with older and more experienced players tends to defer to his older and better players?
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Yeah, the #4 pick in the 2016 draft wasn't worth nearly as much as the #4 pick in a normal draft, so we should have traded it for something that was. Surely the NBA is full of GMs ready to go, "Oh boy, #4 pick!!!" and trade for it without bothering to look at who's in the draft.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Well, that was us with the 8th pick.Cap wrote:Yeah, the #4 pick in the 2016 draft wasn't worth nearly as much as the #4 pick in a normal draft, so we should have traded it for something that was. Surely the NBA is full of GMs ready to go, "Oh boy, #4 pick!!!" and trade for it without bothering to look at who's in the draft.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Because players don't just change their personality type as they grow older. He's not 12.Split T wrote:I don't know why you don't think his age/experience can't be a reason for his lack of aggression. I'm not saying he can turn into Westbrook, but is it that hard to believe a guy who's been playing with older and more experienced players tends to defer to his older and better players?
Amare came into the league aggressive straight out of high school.
Look at Ayton right now. Bagley. Josh Jackson. Sure, the argument can be that these guys are a different caliber player than Bender. But you can go up and down the draft picks the last 5 years and I bet you can't find a single player more passive than him.
I don't know why you think he'll magically become aggressive when he hits 21 years of age. I have never seen anybody so passive in my entire life watching the league. This is not just a marker of age. You're convincing yourself it's because he's young to make it more acceptable.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Well, we really just traded more picks in that same terrible draftO_Gardino wrote:Well, that was us with the 8th pick.Cap wrote:Yeah, the #4 pick in the 2016 draft wasn't worth nearly as much as the #4 pick in a normal draft, so we should have traded it for something that was. Surely the NBA is full of GMs ready to go, "Oh boy, #4 pick!!!" and trade for it without bothering to look at who's in the draft.
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
We could easily have traded down for a future pick (even if heavily protected) and taken Hield/Murray/Chriss/etc.Cap wrote:Yeah, the #4 pick in the 2016 draft wasn't worth nearly as much as the #4 pick in a normal draft, so we should have traded it for something that was. Surely the NBA is full of GMs ready to go, "Oh boy, #4 pick!!!" and trade for it without bothering to look at who's in the draft.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
It's crazy that Monroe, Knight, Dudley, and Chandler comprise 60% of our salary cap.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Hield and Murray went 6 and 7, I'm not sure how we trade down and still draft them. Chriss? Sure we could have but if we wanted hield or Murray we needed to draft them at 4specialsauce wrote:We could easily have traded down for a future pick (even if heavily protected) and taken Hield/Murray/Chriss/etc.Cap wrote:Yeah, the #4 pick in the 2016 draft wasn't worth nearly as much as the #4 pick in a normal draft, so we should have traded it for something that was. Surely the NBA is full of GMs ready to go, "Oh boy, #4 pick!!!" and trade for it without bothering to look at who's in the draft.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
What we could have gotten for trading down is probably comparable in value to what we gave away to trade up from #13 to #8. I consider that package pretty darn insignificant, though I understand that some people have a serious issue with it.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Online
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
The only guy I really liked going in was Sabonis and we could've traded back and gotten him. Even then, his upside was limited but you were getting a nice, skilled, 4/5 with a high bball IQ.
Maker was intriguing but I didn't want us taking a raw, project who's more athlete than basketball player.
Maker was intriguing but I didn't want us taking a raw, project who's more athlete than basketball player.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
I loved him, but was roundly mocked by nearly everyone for thinking he would be a good pick. People here were ecstatic about getting Bender and Chriss. Hindsight. The superiority juice of message board posters everywhere.ShelC wrote:The only guy I really liked going in was Sabonis and we could've traded back and gotten him. Even then, his upside was limited but you were getting a nice, skilled, 4/5 with a high bball IQ.
Maker was intriguing but I didn't want us taking a raw, project who's more athlete than basketball player.
Online
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Maybe he is an angry drunk?specialsauce wrote:Because players don't just change their personality type as they grow older. He's not 12.Split T wrote:I don't know why you don't think his age/experience can't be a reason for his lack of aggression. I'm not saying he can turn into Westbrook, but is it that hard to believe a guy who's been playing with older and more experienced players tends to defer to his older and better players?
Amare came into the league aggressive straight out of high school.
Look at Ayton right now. Bagley. Josh Jackson. Sure, the argument can be that these guys are a different caliber player than Bender. But you can go up and down the draft picks the last 5 years and I bet you can't find a single player more passive than him.
I don't know why you think he'll magically become aggressive when he hits 21 years of age. I have never seen anybody so passive in my entire life watching the league. This is not just a marker of age. You're convincing yourself it's because he's young to make it more acceptable.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Lots of people loved Sabonis.JCSunsfan wrote:I loved him, but was roundly mocked by nearly everyone for thinking he would be a good pick. People here were ecstatic about getting Bender and Chriss. Hindsight. The superiority juice of message board posters everywhere.ShelC wrote:The only guy I really liked going in was Sabonis and we could've traded back and gotten him. Even then, his upside was limited but you were getting a nice, skilled, 4/5 with a high bball IQ.
Maker was intriguing but I didn't want us taking a raw, project who's more athlete than basketball player.
Last edited by O_Gardino on Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8749
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
I was actually thinking maybe they need him to develop an alcohol problemSuperbone wrote:Maybe he is an angry drunk?specialsauce wrote:Because players don't just change their personality type as they grow older. He's not 12.Split T wrote:I don't know why you don't think his age/experience can't be a reason for his lack of aggression. I'm not saying he can turn into Westbrook, but is it that hard to believe a guy who's been playing with older and more experienced players tends to defer to his older and better players?
Amare came into the league aggressive straight out of high school.
Look at Ayton right now. Bagley. Josh Jackson. Sure, the argument can be that these guys are a different caliber player than Bender. But you can go up and down the draft picks the last 5 years and I bet you can't find a single player more passive than him.
I don't know why you think he'll magically become aggressive when he hits 21 years of age. I have never seen anybody so passive in my entire life watching the league. This is not just a marker of age. You're convincing yourself it's because he's young to make it more acceptable.

Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
exactlyO_Gardino wrote:Lots of people loved Sabonis.JCSunsfan wrote:I loved him, but was roundly mocked by nearly everyone for thinking he would be a good pick. People here were ecstatic about getting Bender and Chriss. Hindsight. The superiority juice of message board posters everywhere.ShelC wrote:The only guy I really liked going in was Sabonis and we could've traded back and gotten him. Even then, his upside was limited but you were getting a nice, skilled, 4/5 with a high bball IQ.
Maker was intriguing but I didn't want us taking a raw, project who's more athlete than basketball player.
Online
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
I wanted Sabonis.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
-
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:58 pm
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-30) @ Pacers (25-22), Wed 1/24/18
Add me to the list.Superbone wrote:I wanted Sabonis.
Well, so much for hopes and dreams ...